live·247+ tools indexed·updated daily·review methodology
Perspectives/Nick Bostrom
Nick Bostrom

Nick Bostrom

Professor · Director, FHI

University of Oxford

Cautiously OptimisticAcademic Researcher

Author of "Superintelligence" (2014), which first brought existential AI risk to mainstream attention. Director of the Future of Humanity Institute. His work on existential risk and the orthogonality thesis shaped today's AI safety field.

#superintelligence#existential-risk#transhumanism#ai-safety

Core Positions & Ideas

1

The Simulation Argument — We May Be Living in a Computer Simulation

2003

Proposed a trilemma: either (1) virtually all civilizations go extinct before reaching simulation capability, or (2) advanced civilizations lose interest in running ancestor simulations, or (3) we are almost certainly living in a simulation. While separate from AI safety, this argument established Bostrom as a rigorous thinker about existential risk and long-run futures.

2

Existential Risk Is a Moral Priority of the Highest Order

2003

Developed the framework of existential risks — threats that could permanently curtail humanity's potential. His argument: even a small probability of extinction multiplied by the value of all future human lives makes existential risk reduction the most important moral priority. This framework underpins EA-aligned AI safety work.

3

Superintelligence Will Likely Be Misaligned Unless We Solve Alignment First

2014

'Superintelligence' (2014) brought AI alignment to mainstream attention. Core argument: an AI optimizing any objective will likely pursue it in ways humans didn't intend ('instrumental convergence'), and once it surpasses human intelligence there may be no way to course-correct. The book scared many Silicon Valley engineers into taking alignment seriously.

Essential Reading & Watching

Writing & Talks

No public RSS feed available.

Follow them directly for their latest thinking:

Related Voices